It goes without saying that there are vaccination plans and recommendations for children and adolescents, published by the Robert Koch Institute. It conveys the impression that it is absolutely necessary to have children vaccinated against all sorts of illnesses. And incidentally, it is suggested that vaccinations would strengthen the immune system. But is that really the case?
Inoculate pros and cons
On the other hand, there are the total vaccine opponents who want to reduce any conceivable damage to the health of the vaccine. On the one hand, advocates complain of "vaccine fatigue" in Germany, on the other hand, they are waiting with statistics that allegedly show 90% vaccination coverage in children. There are many contradictory and confusing statements. But where do you, as parents, find support and information for this difficult decision?
It is undisputed that, in fact, there is vaccine damage, more so than is known or acknowledged or "scientifically recognized" by the public. Also for the enormous increase of allergies, chronic and so-called autoimmune diseases and even cancer (especially in children) is causally, at least partially, a participation of vaccines discussed. Evidence here is difficult because there are often years between vaccination and illness.
In the meantime, it is also known that the pharmaceutical industry earns more than stately vaccines, and that the alleged successes in controlling infectious diseases since the introduction of vaccines, the corresponding statistics are creative, to say the least. Regarding statistics, it was generally concealed that times when certain infectious diseases occurred to a large extent and then vaccination campaigns took place were usually times of war, economic crises, hunger and poor hygiene.
If the living conditions improved, the diseases disappeared as well. By overlaying the vaccination campaigns with such times, the decline of infectious diseases due to vaccination has not been clearly established.
With our current life circumstances, there are good conditions for a normal function of the immune system. And has not the intelligence of nature provided us with a highly developed immune system to protect us from disease on our own?
How does a vaccine affect the body?
During a vaccination, synthetic foreign proteins (killed pathogens or antibodies) enter our body. Vaccines are either genetically engineered today or grown on animal substances (eg embryonic chicken cells). There are no long-term studies on the safety of these vaccinations. Also breeding on other animal organs (from monkeys, mice, rabbits) and even cancer cells were or are common practice.
Just as a plant absorbs substances from the soil in itself, every vaccine should also take in substances of its breeding basis, substantially or at least as information. If the vaccine enters the body, antibodies must be produced. Quite probably against the breeding substances. This may hide an increased allergy potential or the starting signal for autoimmune reactions. Mostly because most of the vaccines are given by the blood and allergens can be used everywhere. Only swallowing vaccines go the normal route of a pathogen via the digestive tract and the intestinal mucosa, which forms a natural barrier against allergens
In addition, there are various toxic substances, such as aluminum salts, antibiotics, formaldehyde (avoided in carpets and furniture, since since 2006 as carcinogenic!) And in a few vaccines also thiomersal, a mercury-containing compound. Reason for these substances is according to manufacturer the avoidance of impurities.
Vaccinations of children
If pathogens and all these substances enter the body of a (small) child, they will encounter an immature (up to about 2 years) immune system. This is roughly divided into two main components. One part is cellular / specific defense, the part that reacts with the formation of antibodies to pathogens (including vaccines). The other part is the fast reacting humoral / nonspecific defense, which immediately eliminates invading pathogens with phagocytes, natural killer cells and various dissolving substances. This part virtually protects us from the effects of the "common-pathogens" with which we come in contact on a daily and completely natural basis, thus training our immune system.
When a vaccine is administered, the body is forced to pay increased attention to the part of the antibody production against the administered pathogens. This deprives the second, more extensive part of the immune system of energy. Especially with multiple vaccines. This also explains the frequent susceptibility to infection or allergies, especially in children, after such vaccination. Because the second part is too weakened to ward off the daily influences. Naturally, a child would not be likely to contract five or six diseases simultaneously, but only one. The body would have to deal with only one pathogen, not with several.
Considering now that a child's immune system has matured only about 2 years ago, it is obvious that such a (repeated) procedure in the small, immature organism (lasting) blockages of the immune system and lack or erroneous maturation of the same can cause. The effects of vaccination, such as constant infection tendency, allergies, asthma, etc. are usually experienced later.
In addition, the vaccinations should be made according to a schedule set by the Vaccination Commission (STIKO). Neither the individual maturity of the child nor the state of his immune system is considered.
Of course, there is no 100% protection against infection or the consequences of infectious diseases. However, many diseases that are vaccinated against have largely disappeared in this country or can be avoided by healthy living conditions. In this context, it is important to carefully weigh the risk of possible illness without vaccination and the incalculable risk of vaccine damage. In most cases, unfortunately, the latter seems to predominate.
Incidentally, vaccinations do not provide 100% protection against the disease. Furthermore, it is worth considering, his child only after the 2. To vaccinate. Because then the immune system is largely mature, stable, the risk of vaccine damage thereby lower or can be better recognized.
Alternatively, homeopathy and natural medicine instead of a vaccine offer many opportunities for prevention, health maintenance, but also the elimination of existing vaccine damage.
There is absolute protection, as always in life, neither on one side nor on the other side. The best prerequisite, however, is a healthy, strong and stable immune system that develops naturally and is optimally strengthened (eg healthy diet, as long as possible breastfeeding, homeopathic and herbal remedies). This optimizes the protection against diseases.
If vaccinations are considered, a balance of necessity and risk makes sense, as well as the idea to administer a single vaccination instead of a multiple vaccination.
A well-considered single vaccine may well be useful, but is less stressful and does not overwhelm a healthy organism. For example, children who travel abroad often have different vaccination needs than children who live predominantly here.
No one can take the vaccination decision from you, dear parents. Because she is a personal responsibility.
Therefore, I have tried to present some information on the effects and background of vaccinations, as little is known about this. Of course, this area is much more complex and extensive. My concern is merely to help you, not simply uncritically to indulge in the recommended vaccination marathon, nor to deny this topic without further knowledge of things only as consistently bad. My wish is that you just have to deal more with the pros and cons, consider alternative and natural methods and then make your personal decision in peace.